The CarPlay Conundrum: Rivian’s Resistance and the Consumer Demand
Last March, Wassym Bensaid, the software director of Rivian, was interviewed by Nilay Patel on the Decoder podcast. If you haven’t tuned into Decoder or subscribed to The Verge, you’re missing out on some insightful technology discussions. However, today we’re focusing on a particular topic from that interview: CarPlay.
CarPlay’s Evolution in Modern Vehicles
CarPlay, Apple’s in-car user interface, has revolutionized the way we interact with our phones while driving. In fact, my last three cars, including a 2017 model, featured CarPlay, greatly enhancing the driving experience. With a customized interface for essential apps, CarPlay has become a must-have feature for many car buyers.
I literally won’t buy a car that doesn’t support CarPlay.
Nilay’s Inquiry and Wassym’s Response
During the interview, Nilay questioned Wassym on Rivian’s stance on CarPlay, capturing the essence of a common consumer sentiment: “The reason I want CarPlay is because there are 5,000 apps on my phone and no car manufacturer will ever support them in the in-app infotainment.” He asked Wassym whether Rivian is considering changing its stance on CarPlay integration.
Wassym’s response highlighted a challenge with screen mirroring solutions like CarPlay, which he claimed take over every pixel in the car’s display. However, this perception may not reflect the flexibility CarPlay actually offers.
CarPlay: A Flexible and Optional Interface
There is a version of CarPlay known as CarPlay Ultra, which can integrate with all screens in a vehicle while still allowing the manufacturer’s user interface to coexist. However, the standard CarPlay does not occupy the entire screen. For example, in my wife’s Volvo XC90, CarPlay occupies the upper portion of the screen while Volvo’s own interface remains visible at the bottom.
It’s important to recognize that CarPlay is optional and additive. Drivers who prefer Rivian’s native user interface can simply choose not to use CarPlay. However, for those who rely on apps optimized for CarPlay, such as Overcast, the lack of support becomes a significant drawback.
The Navigation Debate
One argument against CarPlay is its use for navigation, particularly when luxury vehicles like Rivian boast advanced automated driving technology. Critics claim the car needs to know the route to provide the best driving experience. While this is a valid point, future updates to iOS may address these concerns, offering solutions that integrate seamlessly with vehicle systems.
Why CarPlay Support Matters
Ultimately, CarPlay support is essential for many consumers. While I admire Rivian’s vehicles, including the R1T and R1S, and have considered joining the waiting list for an R2, the absence of CarPlay is a dealbreaker for me. CarPlay support is a fundamental expectation, and adopting it could attract a broader customer base to Rivian.
It’s time for Rivian to reconsider its stance and embrace CarPlay as an option. When that happens, I, along with many others, will be eager to explore Rivian’s offerings, perhaps even queuing up for an R3X.
For the full discussion, you can read Wassym’s detailed response here.
“`
